This is a reland of I23ef57eb52bfb1eb363682dadf98c571c12afcd1.
It was reverted in Ia548067acbf640010f4c8fbed29a0012a274af05. Reason for revert:
Findit (https://goo.gl/kROfz5) identified this CL at revision 557680 as the culprit
for introducing flakiness in the tests as shown on:
https://findit-for-me.appspot.com/waterfall/flake/flake-culprit?key=ag9zfmZpbmRpdC1mb3ItbWVyQwsSDEZsYWtlQ3VscHJpdCIxY2hyb21pdW0vZmM5NTUwMWZiMjllM2U3NDg3ZmZmOThjMTdlNmFhYmExMDQ2YjMzMAw
The data race has been fixed in:
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1064450.
Original change's description:
> Create BrowserThread::IO thread before browser main loop to start
> ServiceManager.
>
> We need a thread to post/execute tasks when starting the
> ServiceManager. This thread needs to be created before the browser
> main loop is initialized, and will be registered as the
> BrowserThread::IO thread which is currently used by ServiceManager
> connections.
>
> The creation of such a thread is moved to service_manager::main via
> MainDelegate::CreateIOThreadAndGetTaskRunner(). Since it requires no
> thread created before calling fork() on posix, we also move the setup
> of sandbox before creating the IO thread.
>
> Bug: 740677, 729596
> Change-Id: I23ef57eb52bfb1eb363682dadf98c571c12afcd1
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/969098
> Commit-Queue: Xi Han <hanxi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: John Abd-El-Malek <jam@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Gabriel Charette <gab@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#557680}
Bug: 740677, 729596
Change-Id: I9afb0cdc0f11a1d437c2e9bd09c374503c3d5a4b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1059949
Reviewed-by: John Abd-El-Malek <jam@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Gabriel Charette <gab@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Xi Han <hanxi@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#560724}
ServiceManager.
We need a thread to post/execute tasks when starting the
ServiceManager. This thread needs to be created before the browser
main loop is initialized, and will be registered as the
BrowserThread::IO thread which is currently used by ServiceManager
connections.
The creation of such a thread is moved to service_manager::main via
MainDelegate::CreateIOThreadAndGetTaskRunner(). Since it requires no
thread created before calling fork() on posix, we also move the setup
of sandbox before creating the IO thread.
Bug: 740677, 729596
Change-Id: I23ef57eb52bfb1eb363682dadf98c571c12afcd1
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/969098
Commit-Queue: Xi Han <hanxi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: John Abd-El-Malek <jam@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Gabriel Charette <gab@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#557680}
This is a reland of d260e9cf66
It was reverted because of crbug.com/824716, these weren't new crashes
but known crashes mislabeled as a fallout of this change.
http://cl/190471699 fixes the crash backend to not rely on
"content::BrowserThreadImpl::IOThreadRun" being in the signature.
Only diff in this CL is to use base::debug::Alias() in methods that we
don't want optimized (i.e. IOThreadRun) out as CHECK_GT was seen as
optimized out in some of the reported crashes (even though the same
pattern as before was used by this CL..?)
Original change's description:
> Refactor BrowserThreadImpl, BrowserProcessSubThread, and BrowserMainLoop
>
> This brings back the invariant that BrowserThread::IO isn't available
> before BrowserMainLoop::CreateThreads(). This was broken to fix issue
> 729596 to bring up the thread earlier for ServiceManager but it is
> important that code that posts to BrowserThread::IO statically have an
> happens-after relationship to BrowserMainLoop::CreateThreads(). Exposing
> it statically earlier put that invariant at risk.
>
> Thankfully fixing issue 815225 resulted in finally reaching the long
> sought goal of only having BrowserThread::UI/IO. Now that the IO thread
> is also kicked off before it's named statically, BrowserThreadImpl no
> longer needs to be a base::Thread, hence this refactoring.
>
> Before this CL:
> * BrowserThreadImpl was a base::Thread
> (could be a fake thread if SetMessageLoop was used)
> * BrowserProcessSubThread was a BrowserThreadImpl
> (performed a bit more initialization)
> * BrowserProcessSubThread was only used in production (in
> BrowserMainLoop)
> * BrowserThreadImpl was used for fake threads (BrowserMainLoop for
> BrowserThread::UI) and for testing (TestBrowserThread(Impl)).
> * BrowserThreadImpl overrode Init/Run/CleanUp() from base::Thread to
> perform some sanity checks as well as drive IOThread's Delegate (ref.
> BrowserThread::SetIOThreadDelegate())
> * BrowserProcessSubThread re-overrode Init/Run/CleanUp() to perform
> per-thread //content initialization (tests missed out on that per
> TestBrowserThread bypassing BrowserProcessSubThread by directly
> subclassing BrowserThreadImpl).
>
> With this CL:
> * BrowserThreadImpl is merely a scoped object that binds a provided
> SingleThreadTaskRunner to a BrowserThread::ID.
> * BrowserProcessSubThread is a base::Thread and performs all of the
> initialization and cleanup specific to //content (this means it now
> also manages BrowserThread::SetIOThreadDelegate())
> * BrowserProcessSubThread can be brought up early before being bound to
> a BrowserThread::ID (BrowserMainLoop handles that through
> BrowserProcessSubThread ::RegisterAsBrowserThread())
>
> Unfortunate exceptions required for this CL:
> * IOThread::Init() (invoked through BrowserThreadDelegate) perfoms
> blocking operations this was previously performed before installed
> the ThreadRestrictions on BrowserThread::IO. But now that //content
> is initialized after bringing up the thread, a
> base::ScopedAllowBlocking is required in scope of IOThread::Init().
> * TestBrowserThread previously bypassing BrowserProcessSubThread by
> directly subclassing BrowserThreadImpl meant it wasn't subject to
> ThreadRestrictions (unfortunate becomes it denies allowance
> verification to product code running in unit tests). Adding it back
> causes DCHECKs, as such
> BrowserProcessSubThread::AllowBlockingForTesting was added to allow
> this CL to pass CQ.
>
> Of note:
> * BrowserProcessSubThread is still written as though it supports many
> BrowserThread::IDs but in practice it's mostly always
> BrowserThread::IO (except in ThreadWatcherTest I think). This change
> was big enough that I didn't bother also breaking that
> generalization.
> * BrowserThreadImpl's constructor was made private to ensure only
> BrowserProcessSubThread and a few select callers get to drive it (to
> avoid previous missed initialization issues)
> * Atomics to manage BrowserThread::SetIOThreadDelegate were removed.
> Restriction was instead added that this only be called before
> initialization and after shutdown (this was already the case).
>
> Follow-ups to this CL:
> * //ios duplicates this logic and will need to undergo the same change
> as a follow-up
> * Fixing ios will allow removal of base::Thread::SetMessageLoop hack :)
> * Removing BrowserThreadGlobals::lock_ to address crbug.com/821034 will
> be much easier
> * BrowserThread post APIs should DCHECK rather than no-op if using a
> BrowserThread::ID before it's registered.
>
> Bug: 815225, 821034, 729596
> Change-Id: If1038f23079df72203b1e95c7d26647f8824a726
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/969104
> Reviewed-by: John Abd-El-Malek <jam@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Gabriel Charette <gab@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#544440}
TBR=jam@chromium.org
Bug: 815225, 821034, 729596, 824716
Change-Id: I9a180975c69a008f8519d1d3d44663aa58a74a92
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/980793
Reviewed-by: John Abd-El-Malek <jam@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Gabriel Charette <gab@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Gabriel Charette <gab@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#546104}
This reverts commit d260e9cf66.
Reason for revert: In Windows Canary versions since 67.0.3377.0, where this commit landed, IO thread hang reports have spiked dramatically. It is now the #1 browser crash report on Windows Canary at 33% of reports. I'm speculatively reverting this to see if the crash rate heals.
Original change's description:
> Refactor BrowserThreadImpl, BrowserProcessSubThread, and BrowserMainLoop
>
> This brings back the invariant that BrowserThread::IO isn't available
> before BrowserMainLoop::CreateThreads(). This was broken to fix issue
> 729596 to bring up the thread earlier for ServiceManager but it is
> important that code that posts to BrowserThread::IO statically have an
> happens-after relationship to BrowserMainLoop::CreateThreads(). Exposing
> it statically earlier put that invariant at risk.
>
> Thankfully fixing issue 815225 resulted in finally reaching the long
> sought goal of only having BrowserThread::UI/IO. Now that the IO thread
> is also kicked off before it's named statically, BrowserThreadImpl no
> longer needs to be a base::Thread, hence this refactoring.
>
> Before this CL:
> * BrowserThreadImpl was a base::Thread
> (could be a fake thread if SetMessageLoop was used)
> * BrowserProcessSubThread was a BrowserThreadImpl
> (performed a bit more initialization)
> * BrowserProcessSubThread was only used in production (in
> BrowserMainLoop)
> * BrowserThreadImpl was used for fake threads (BrowserMainLoop for
> BrowserThread::UI) and for testing (TestBrowserThread(Impl)).
> * BrowserThreadImpl overrode Init/Run/CleanUp() from base::Thread to
> perform some sanity checks as well as drive IOThread's Delegate (ref.
> BrowserThread::SetIOThreadDelegate())
> * BrowserProcessSubThread re-overrode Init/Run/CleanUp() to perform
> per-thread //content initialization (tests missed out on that per
> TestBrowserThread bypassing BrowserProcessSubThread by directly
> subclassing BrowserThreadImpl).
>
> With this CL:
> * BrowserThreadImpl is merely a scoped object that binds a provided
> SingleThreadTaskRunner to a BrowserThread::ID.
> * BrowserProcessSubThread is a base::Thread and performs all of the
> initialization and cleanup specific to //content (this means it now
> also manages BrowserThread::SetIOThreadDelegate())
> * BrowserProcessSubThread can be brought up early before being bound to
> a BrowserThread::ID (BrowserMainLoop handles that through
> BrowserProcessSubThread ::RegisterAsBrowserThread())
>
> Unfortunate exceptions required for this CL:
> * IOThread::Init() (invoked through BrowserThreadDelegate) perfoms
> blocking operations this was previously performed before installed
> the ThreadRestrictions on BrowserThread::IO. But now that //content
> is initialized after bringing up the thread, a
> base::ScopedAllowBlocking is required in scope of IOThread::Init().
> * TestBrowserThread previously bypassing BrowserProcessSubThread by
> directly subclassing BrowserThreadImpl meant it wasn't subject to
> ThreadRestrictions (unfortunate becomes it denies allowance
> verification to product code running in unit tests). Adding it back
> causes DCHECKs, as such
> BrowserProcessSubThread::AllowBlockingForTesting was added to allow
> this CL to pass CQ.
>
> Of note:
> * BrowserProcessSubThread is still written as though it supports many
> BrowserThread::IDs but in practice it's mostly always
> BrowserThread::IO (except in ThreadWatcherTest I think). This change
> was big enough that I didn't bother also breaking that
> generalization.
> * BrowserThreadImpl's constructor was made private to ensure only
> BrowserProcessSubThread and a few select callers get to drive it (to
> avoid previous missed initialization issues)
> * Atomics to manage BrowserThread::SetIOThreadDelegate were removed.
> Restriction was instead added that this only be called before
> initialization and after shutdown (this was already the case).
>
> Follow-ups to this CL:
> * //ios duplicates this logic and will need to undergo the same change
> as a follow-up
> * Fixing ios will allow removal of base::Thread::SetMessageLoop hack :)
> * Removing BrowserThreadGlobals::lock_ to address crbug.com/821034 will
> be much easier
> * BrowserThread post APIs should DCHECK rather than no-op if using a
> BrowserThread::ID before it's registered.
>
> Bug: 815225, 821034, 729596
> Change-Id: If1038f23079df72203b1e95c7d26647f8824a726
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/969104
> Reviewed-by: John Abd-El-Malek <jam@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Gabriel Charette <gab@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#544440}
TBR=gab@chromium.org,jam@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
# Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed > 1 day ago.
# falken: Skipping presubmit to use deprecated ThreadResrictions::DisallowWaiting().
Bug: 815225, 821034, 729596
Change-Id: I2be97c5d8183497c005ab397c871f625b034d850
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/979752
Commit-Queue: Matt Falkenhagen <falken@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Falkenhagen <falken@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#545725}
This brings back the invariant that BrowserThread::IO isn't available
before BrowserMainLoop::CreateThreads(). This was broken to fix issue
729596 to bring up the thread earlier for ServiceManager but it is
important that code that posts to BrowserThread::IO statically have an
happens-after relationship to BrowserMainLoop::CreateThreads(). Exposing
it statically earlier put that invariant at risk.
Thankfully fixing issue 815225 resulted in finally reaching the long
sought goal of only having BrowserThread::UI/IO. Now that the IO thread
is also kicked off before it's named statically, BrowserThreadImpl no
longer needs to be a base::Thread, hence this refactoring.
Before this CL:
* BrowserThreadImpl was a base::Thread
(could be a fake thread if SetMessageLoop was used)
* BrowserProcessSubThread was a BrowserThreadImpl
(performed a bit more initialization)
* BrowserProcessSubThread was only used in production (in
BrowserMainLoop)
* BrowserThreadImpl was used for fake threads (BrowserMainLoop for
BrowserThread::UI) and for testing (TestBrowserThread(Impl)).
* BrowserThreadImpl overrode Init/Run/CleanUp() from base::Thread to
perform some sanity checks as well as drive IOThread's Delegate (ref.
BrowserThread::SetIOThreadDelegate())
* BrowserProcessSubThread re-overrode Init/Run/CleanUp() to perform
per-thread //content initialization (tests missed out on that per
TestBrowserThread bypassing BrowserProcessSubThread by directly
subclassing BrowserThreadImpl).
With this CL:
* BrowserThreadImpl is merely a scoped object that binds a provided
SingleThreadTaskRunner to a BrowserThread::ID.
* BrowserProcessSubThread is a base::Thread and performs all of the
initialization and cleanup specific to //content (this means it now
also manages BrowserThread::SetIOThreadDelegate())
* BrowserProcessSubThread can be brought up early before being bound to
a BrowserThread::ID (BrowserMainLoop handles that through
BrowserProcessSubThread ::RegisterAsBrowserThread())
Unfortunate exceptions required for this CL:
* IOThread::Init() (invoked through BrowserThreadDelegate) perfoms
blocking operations this was previously performed before installed
the ThreadRestrictions on BrowserThread::IO. But now that //content
is initialized after bringing up the thread, a
base::ScopedAllowBlocking is required in scope of IOThread::Init().
* TestBrowserThread previously bypassing BrowserProcessSubThread by
directly subclassing BrowserThreadImpl meant it wasn't subject to
ThreadRestrictions (unfortunate becomes it denies allowance
verification to product code running in unit tests). Adding it back
causes DCHECKs, as such
BrowserProcessSubThread::AllowBlockingForTesting was added to allow
this CL to pass CQ.
Of note:
* BrowserProcessSubThread is still written as though it supports many
BrowserThread::IDs but in practice it's mostly always
BrowserThread::IO (except in ThreadWatcherTest I think). This change
was big enough that I didn't bother also breaking that
generalization.
* BrowserThreadImpl's constructor was made private to ensure only
BrowserProcessSubThread and a few select callers get to drive it (to
avoid previous missed initialization issues)
* Atomics to manage BrowserThread::SetIOThreadDelegate were removed.
Restriction was instead added that this only be called before
initialization and after shutdown (this was already the case).
Follow-ups to this CL:
* //ios duplicates this logic and will need to undergo the same change
as a follow-up
* Fixing ios will allow removal of base::Thread::SetMessageLoop hack :)
* Removing BrowserThreadGlobals::lock_ to address crbug.com/821034 will
be much easier
* BrowserThread post APIs should DCHECK rather than no-op if using a
BrowserThread::ID before it's registered.
Bug: 815225, 821034, 729596
Change-Id: If1038f23079df72203b1e95c7d26647f8824a726
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/969104
Reviewed-by: John Abd-El-Malek <jam@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Gabriel Charette <gab@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#544440}
Missing includes are blocking a bigger upcoming change that
removes browser_thread.h from other places which tend to have a far
reach.
This removal was done by a script which adds browser_thread.h if
the file has "BrowserThread::" on a line which isn't a comment.
If the file is a header it also substracts the include from matching .cc
file if any.
If the file is a .cc it omits the include if it's already in the
matching .h
Minor exceptions :
* files that already included test_browser_thread.h (not doing so
broke DEPS as some tests are explicitly allowed to include
test_browser_thread.h but no content/public)
* chrome/renderer/chrome_content_renderer_client_browsertest.cc
(because it violates DEPS already by using BrowserThread:: from
content/renderer but this CL doesn't aim to fix tricky use cases)
TBR=jam@chromium.org
Bug: 815225, 821034
Change-Id: I5274433918c85f26caaa5b99adb990f07222fb99
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/967186
Reviewed-by: Gabriel Charette <gab@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#543834}
A major part of android's ChildProcessLauncher is implemented in Java
so having an easy access to the launcher thread is important.
Refactor JavaHandlerThread in base so that that java part can be created
first, and then connected with native peer after consutrction. This is
needed because the launcher thread can be used before native library is
loaded.
Add LauncherThread in content which is a simple wrapper around
JavaHandlerThread. Then for android, override the launcher thread
message loop. Note this means the launcher thread will no longer be
joined on shutdown, but this is not a problem in practice since android
never does clean shutdowns.
Convert two cases of random background threads in ChildProcessLauncher
to use LauncherThread. There are more in the future.
BUG=701442
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2774363003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#460509}
This blocks the conversion of //base from scoped_ptr to std::unique_ptr.
BUG=554298
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.blink:linux_blink_rel
R=danakj@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1852953002 .
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#384767}
This patch was automatically generated by applying clang fixit hints
generated by the plugin to the source tree.
BUG=417463
TBR=sky@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/667943003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#300469}
This step is a giant search and replace for OVERRIDE and FINAL to
replace them with their lowercase versions.
BUG=417463
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/637183002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#298804}
While doing so, fix a few issues with the code like ordering of URLRequestContext to ensure correct destruction order. Also fix const correctness in some places.
BUG=58859
TEST=none
TBR=willchan
Review URL: https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/10299002
git-svn-id: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src@136497 0039d316-1c4b-4281-b951-d872f2087c98
Only content/ now has the ability to create BrowserThread objects,
with the exception that tests can create the
content::TestBrowserThread subclass, and (temporarily) code in chrome/
can create the DeprecatedBrowserThread subclass.
A follow-up change will make content/ take care of its own thread
creation, remove DeprecatedBrowserThread, and move all state and
non-trivial constructors from BrowserThread down to BrowserThreadImpl.
Also moved BrowserProcessSubThread into content/ namespace. As part
of follow-up cleanup, chrome/ will stop using this class.
BUG=98716
TEST=existing
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/8392042
git-svn-id: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src@107718 0039d316-1c4b-4281-b951-d872f2087c98
