Swap strong/weak typing for static/dynamic typing.
This is as pedantic as nits get, but according to Wikipedia, strong/weak typing doesn't have a precise definition, whereas static/dynamic typing is clearly defined. We might as well refer to the clearly-defined concepts here. Anecdotally, I've heard "strong/weak" used to refer to a language's willingness to do implicit coersions. E.g., `1 + "1"` is valid in JavaScript, but invalid in Python; so Python is more strongly-typed than JavaScript, even though both are dynamically-typed (ignoring the new optional type annotations in Python, and Closure-flavored JavaScript). Change-Id: I23ae6441fde7a29617b2cf00f588fdf1cfda0c2b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/3213286 Reviewed-by: Dirk Pranke <dpranke@google.com> Commit-Queue: Dirk Pranke <dpranke@google.com> Auto-Submit: Chris Fredrickson <cfredric@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#929474}
This commit is contained in:

committed by
Chromium LUCI CQ

parent
b42abc40b5
commit
477f29af20
@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
## What is type safety?
|
||||
|
||||
[Strongly-typed languages](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strong_and_weak_typing)
|
||||
[Statically-typed languages](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_system#Static_type_checking)
|
||||
like C++ and Java have the notion of variable types.
|
||||
|
||||
This is typically baked into how you declare variables:
|
||||
@ -24,12 +24,12 @@ you if there's no sane default action to take.
|
||||
Typing can also be manually annotated via mechanisms like `dynamic_cast` and
|
||||
`static_cast` or older C-style casts (i.e. `(Type)`).
|
||||
|
||||
Using stongly-typed languages provide _some_ level of protection against
|
||||
Using statically-typed languages provides _some_ level of protection against
|
||||
accidentally using variables in the wrong context.
|
||||
|
||||
JavaScript is weakly-typed and doesn't offer this safety by default. This makes
|
||||
writing JavaScript more error prone, and various type errors have resulted in
|
||||
real bugs seen by many users.
|
||||
JavaScript is dynamically-typed and doesn't offer this safety by default. This
|
||||
makes writing JavaScript more error prone, and various type errors have resulted
|
||||
in real bugs seen by many users.
|
||||
|
||||
## Chrome's solution to typechecking JavaScript
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user