Docs: Include fenced frames in "Aggressive Reuse" section
Change-Id: I41fbe4107de5169e7093b28c127bb8b02bdc86b2 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/3727307 Reviewed-by: Alex Moshchuk <alexmos@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Adithya Srinivasan <adithyas@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1024713}
This commit is contained in:

committed by
Chromium LUCI CQ

parent
a1be8d6449
commit
c8e3d599cf
@ -322,13 +322,15 @@ decision.
|
||||
limit, and instead relies on the OS to discard processes.
|
||||
* **Aggressive Reuse**: For some cases (including on Android), Chromium will
|
||||
aggressively look for existing same-site processes to reuse even before
|
||||
reaching the process limit. Out-of-process iframes (OOPIFs) use this
|
||||
approach, such that an `example.com` iframe in a cross-site page will be
|
||||
placed in an existing `example.com` process (in any browsing context group),
|
||||
even if the process limit has not been reached. This keeps the process
|
||||
count lower, based on the assumption that most iframes are less resource
|
||||
demanding than top-level documents. Similarly, ServiceWorkers are generally
|
||||
placed in the same process as a document that is likely to rely on them.
|
||||
reaching the process limit. Out-of-process iframes (OOPIFs) and [fenced
|
||||
frames](https://developer.chrome.com/en/docs/privacy-sandbox/fenced-frame/)
|
||||
use this approach, such that an `example.com` iframe in a cross-site page
|
||||
will be placed in an existing `example.com` process (in any browsing context
|
||||
group), even if the process limit has not been reached. This keeps the
|
||||
process count lower, based on the assumption that most iframes/fenced frames
|
||||
are less resource demanding than top-level documents. Similarly,
|
||||
ServiceWorkers are generally placed in the same process as a document that
|
||||
is likely to rely on them.
|
||||
* **Extensions**: Chromium ensures that extensions do not share a process with
|
||||
each other or with web pages, but also that a large number of extensions
|
||||
will not consume the entire soft process limit, forcing same-site web pages
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user