Add documentation of web SDO codes of conduct.
Change-Id: Iff8e118b449a3e5d223e00e1feef911990630926 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/2876177 Auto-Submit: Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Chris Harrelson <chrishtr@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#888649}
This commit is contained in:

committed by
Chromium LUCI CQ

parent
2fafe91097
commit
f2f38a8a6f
docs/standards
9
docs/standards/DIR_METADATA
Normal file
9
docs/standards/DIR_METADATA
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
|
||||
# Metadata information for this directory.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# For more information on DIR_METADATA files, see:
|
||||
# https://source.chromium.org/chromium/infra/infra/+/main:go/src/infra/tools/dirmd/README.md
|
||||
#
|
||||
# For the schema of this file, see Metadata message:
|
||||
# https://source.chromium.org/chromium/infra/infra/+/main:go/src/infra/tools/dirmd/proto/dir_metadata.proto
|
||||
|
||||
team_email: "spec-mentors@chromium.org"
|
13
docs/standards/README.md
Normal file
13
docs/standards/README.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
|
||||
# Developing web standards within Chromium
|
||||
|
||||
The [Chromium process for launching
|
||||
features](https://www.chromium.org/blink/launching-features) requires that
|
||||
web-exposed features go through (though not always complete) a public
|
||||
standardization process.
|
||||
|
||||
We provide a [specification mentorship
|
||||
program](https://www.chromium.org/blink/spec-mentors) to help you go through
|
||||
this process.
|
||||
|
||||
If you notice misbehavior in a standardization venue, see their [codes of
|
||||
conduct](conduct.md).
|
74
docs/standards/conduct.md
Normal file
74
docs/standards/conduct.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
|
||||
# Codes of Conduct
|
||||
|
||||
Chromium contributors participate in many organizations that standardize Web
|
||||
APIs. These organizations have rules that govern participants' behavior. We need
|
||||
to follow these rules, and we can expect that others in these bodies will also
|
||||
follow the rules.
|
||||
|
||||
This document links to each organization's code of conduct and any contact
|
||||
information that organization provides for navigating difficulties. For
|
||||
organizations without a code of conduct, we're happy to help them develop one.
|
||||
|
||||
If you notice someone breaking a venue's code of conduct, you have several options for handling the situation:
|
||||
|
||||
1. If you feel comfortable, call out the behavior in the discussion and give an
|
||||
opportunity for it to be addressed. For example:
|
||||
|
||||
> "This comment is not constructive/does not help move us to consensus/makes
|
||||
an incorrect assumption/is not actionable. Could you please re-state or
|
||||
rephrase your comments accordingly?"
|
||||
1. If you do not feel comfortable raising the concern directly, or the behavior
|
||||
is not fixed or acknowledged, disengage with the discussion and escalate the
|
||||
issue:
|
||||
1. To your [spec mentor](https://www.chromium.org/blink/spec-mentors) if you have one.
|
||||
1. To a relevant group chair.
|
||||
1. To the SDO's ombuds group as identified below and/or in their code of conduct.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[TOC]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## W3C
|
||||
|
||||
See the [Code of Ethics and Professional
|
||||
Conduct](https://www.w3.org/Consortium/cepc/) and the
|
||||
[procedures](https://www.w3.org/Consortium/pwe/#Procedures) used to enforce it.
|
||||
The ombuds may be contacted
|
||||
[individually](https://www.w3.org/Consortium/pwe/#ombuds) or collectively at
|
||||
<ombuds@w3.org>.
|
||||
|
||||
## WHATWG
|
||||
|
||||
See the [Code of Conduct](https://whatwg.org/code-of-conduct). Escalate via
|
||||
<sg@whatwg.org>.
|
||||
|
||||
## IETF
|
||||
|
||||
See the [Guidelines for Conduct](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7154.html)
|
||||
and the [Anti-Harassment
|
||||
Procedures](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7776.html).
|
||||
|
||||
Escalate via [individual ombudspeople](https://www.ietf.org/contact/ombudsteam/)
|
||||
or <ombudsteam@ietf.org>.
|
||||
|
||||
## ECMA TC39
|
||||
|
||||
See the [Code of Conduct](https://tc39.es/code-of-conduct/). Report violations via <tc39-conduct-reports@googlegroups.com>.
|
||||
|
||||
## Khronos
|
||||
|
||||
See the
|
||||
[https://www.khronos.org/events/code-of-conduct](https://www.khronos.org/events/code-of-conduct).
|
||||
Their escalation path is more tailored to events than standardization activity,
|
||||
but you can [file an anonymous
|
||||
report](https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1nr1B_TOMIhSXh1yG8VsvGpEO9p6GWY-3kxJu-rnA5dU/viewform).
|
||||
|
||||
## FIDO
|
||||
|
||||
The [FIDO Alliance](https://fidoalliance.org/) does not currently have a code of conduct.
|
||||
|
||||
## AO Media
|
||||
|
||||
The [Alliance for Open Media](https://aomedia.org/) does not currently have a code of conduct.
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user